Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Pullen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1981No. 15389, CA 17097PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

This is a suit brought by the owners of an easement to enjoin alleged obstruction of the easement by defendant, the servient owner. The trial court entered a decree granting a partial injunction, but denied other injunctive relief. Plaintiffs appeal and seek a modification of the decree to prohibit all the alleged interferences with the easement.

Plaintiffs farm property known as the Marsh Home Place. Defendant operates a mobile home park on adjacent land in an area called Foley Lakes Property. In 1912, as part of the settlement of the estate of Abel Marsh, the Marsh Home Place was severed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Tauscher v. AndrussOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Van Natta v. Nys & EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Landauer v. SteelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Musselshell Ranch Company v. Seidel-JoukovaMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Watson v. BanducciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Hunt v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Vance v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Dianne v. WingateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API