Legal Opinion

Tauscher v. Andruss

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1965PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a suit for a mandatory injunction requiring defendants to change the location of a moorage line. Plaintiffs appeal from a decree denying them equitable relief.

Plaintiffs and defendants own adjoining parcels of land along the Columbia river and both operate marinas. Originally Tom Lineham owned both parcels constituting at that time one parcel with a 250-foot river frontage. In 1950 he established the first moor-age in the area by driving dolphins in a northerly direction into the river. In 1954 he sold to defendants the west 150 feet of his property. The moorage extended from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Columbia Land Co. v. Van Dusen Invest. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Marsh v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Abbott v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Crimmins v. SimondsUtah Supreme Court · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API