McGill v. Huling Buick Company

This is an action for damages for fraud in the sale of an automobile by an automobile dealer. Defendant appeals from a jury verdict and judgment for $900 in actual damages and $4,999 in punitive damages. ①

On this appeal defendant does not contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict or that there was any error relating to the admission of evidence or instructions to the jury. Instead, the only assignments of error relate to the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ complaint. Thus, defendant contends: (1) that the facts stated in plaintiffs’ complaint did not constitute a cause of…