Legal Opinion

Sumrell v. Household Finance Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

- This is an action for actual and punitive damages for the conversion ■ of an automobile. Defendant appealed from that portion of a judgment awarding punitive damages. The following are the facts stated in a manner most favorable to plaintiff as is proper after judgment.'

• The defendant was a judgment creditor of Mrs. Michael Peetron. On October 8, 1966, Mrs. Peckron sold the automobile in question to plaintiff. Plaintiff mailed the documents of title with a request for transfer to the State Department of Motor Vehicles on October 14. . The documents of title were received’ by thé Department…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. Jim Fisher Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McGill v. Huling Buick CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Dorn v. WilmarthOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Landauer v. SteelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Osborn v. Gene Teague Chevrolet CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API