Sumrell v. Household Finance Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
- This is an action for actual and punitive damages for the conversion ■ of an automobile. Defendant appealed from that portion of a judgment awarding punitive damages. The following are the facts stated in a manner most favorable to plaintiff as is proper after judgment.'
• The defendant was a judgment creditor of Mrs. Michael Peetron. On October 8, 1966, Mrs. Peckron sold the automobile in question to plaintiff. Plaintiff mailed the documents of title with a request for transfer to the State Department of Motor Vehicles on October 14. . The documents of title were received’ by thé Department…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chamberlain v. Jim Fisher Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- McGill v. Huling Buick CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Dorn v. WilmarthOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Landauer v. SteelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Osborn v. Gene Teague Chevrolet CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.