Legal Opinion

D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-Bastian

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 2005No. 00-CV-0453; A119830PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

In this action to enforce easement rights, plaintiffs assign error to the trial court’s dismissal, after a trial to the court, of their claims for interference with roadway and pipeline easements, its award of attorney fees to defendant, and its failure to award attorney fees to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs argue that defendant interfered with their easement rights by relocating an easement road that crosses defendant’s property; placing encroachments on the easement; constructing a new road that is unstable and unsafe; and, in the construction process, adding fill over a pipeline, thereby making…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Cheney v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Tipperman v. TsiatsosOregon Supreme Court · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Knight v. NyaraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Sander v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Bolduc v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Johnson v. Highway 101 Investments, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API