Corona v. Lundigan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEVERLY, J. *
Introduction
This is an appeal by defendant (appellant) Lundigan from a judgment by the court on January 21, 1983, after default, which awarded to plaintiff (respondent) $25,708.23.
In its judgment, the court found that plaintiff was defrauded by defendant, who made false and fraudulent representations to plaintiff, and that defendant breached his fiduciary obligations to plaintiff arising from appellant’s position as real estate broker in the sale of two properties.
Facts
Though defendant extensively cites the record of the testimony during the trial which resulted in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Kunza v. GaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Heathman v. VantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Estate of WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Coleman v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Steven M. Garber & Associates v. EskandarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- M. E. Gray Co. v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Kahn v. LASORDA'S DUGOUT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.