Kahn v. LASORDA'S DUGOUT, INC.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
Introduction
Plaintiff David L. Kahn appeals from an order dismissing his fourth amended complaint following an unsuccessful application for the entry of default. Because the trial court failed to exercise discretion in deciding whether to accept copies of promissory notes in lieu of the originals at the default prove-up hearing, we reverse and remand for a new hearing.
Procedural Summary and Factual Statement
As there was no contested factual determination, the underlying events are gleaned from the complaint, plaintiffs declaration filed in support of his default application,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Dickson, Carlson & Campillo v. PoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Chauncey v. NiemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Law Offices of Dixon R. Howell v. ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Carpenter v. JACK IN THE BOX CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Doe v. LusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Branner v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Melbostad v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.