Coleman v. Gulf Insurance Group
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
Plaintiffs obtain a judgment against defendant, defendant appeals, and the parties settle while the appeal is pending. May plaintiffs then bring a new suit to recover additional damages against the defendant’s insurer, claiming that the insurer was responsible for instigating the appeal, and that it did so knowing the appeal was without merit but in order to achieve delay and coerce settlement?
*788As we shall explain, while the prosecution of a frivolous appeal for the purpose of delay is clearly improper, the Legislature has provided a remedy for such frivolous and delaying…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.