Legal Opinion

Steven M. Garber & Associates v. Eskandarian

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 2007No. B183966PublishedCited by 20 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLIER, J.

Respondent Steven M. Garber & Associates (Garber) brought an action against appellants Alec Eskandarian (A. Eskandarian), Raffle Eskandarian (R. Eskandarian), New Day Communications, Inc. (New Day), Webnet One Enterprises, Inc. (Webnet), and Global Male Pass.Com (Global) for unpaid attorney fees in the amount of $132,038.32. The trial court granted Garber’s motions for terminating sanctions based on appellants’ failure to respond to discovery propounded by Garber. Appellants appeal from the resulting default judgment. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Garber filed its action against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sporn v. Home Depot USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Olson v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Corona v. LundiganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Appleton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Marciano v. Fahs (In Re Marciano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. J.W. v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of N.Y., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. McDaniel v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  5. Pagnini v. Union Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API