Legal Opinion
Young v. Redman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1976No. Civ. 45874PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
Defendant, cross-complainant and cross-defendant Marshall Redman (hereinafter Redman) appeals from a judgment for money damages in favor of plaintiff, cross-defendant and respondent Edward D. Young, Jr. (hereinafter Young) for breach of contract to purchase real property and in favor of cross-complainants and respondents Louis Kloosterman (hereinafter Kloosterman) and Thomas J. Gibbons, Jr. (hereinafter Gibbons) for broker commissions. Defendant Redman also appeals from the trial court’s awarding $1,000 to each of the above respondents as sanctions.
The Case
On March 18, 1970,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Palmer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.