Legal Opinion
Heathman v. Vant
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1959No. Civ. 23533PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside and annul interlocutory and final decrees of divorce.
On June 4, 1953, Evelyn Vant filed this action for divorce against defendant. She alleged that for more than one year last past and immediately preceding the commencement of the action she had resided in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. An order was made for publication of summons. The order stated that defendant resided in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Copies of the complaint and summons were personally served on defendant in Pittsburgh on June 17,1953.
On…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Vant v. GishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Cope v. CopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Askmo v. AskmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.