Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Flaherty

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1982No. S.F. 24307PublishedCited by 481 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Did the trial court abuse its discretion under the particular facts of this case when it refused to order a mother, who testified she worked part time but could obtain full-time work if she chose, to pay child support and ordered both parents to pay the child’s transportation costs? Was an appeal based on this issue frivolous? What procedures should the Courts df Appeal follow before fining or criticizing attorneys for prosecuting frivolous appeals? (See Code Civ. Proc., § 907; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 26 (a).)

I

Jacquelyn and James iFlaherty were married in 1974. Their…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by481 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

476 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API