Legal Opinion

Kunza v. Gaskell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1979No. Civ. 41274PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Kenneth Kunza and Pamela Mae Kunza, his wife, to whom for convenience we shall hereafter refer in the singular as Kunza, commenced an action against their neighbors, Duane U. Gaskell and Betty J. Gaskell, his wife, whom for similar reasons we shall describe as Gaskell. It concerned the boundary line dividing their respective properties. By the action Kunza, among other things, sought to eject Gaskell from, and to quiet title to, a strip of land which Gaskell had entered upon, and damages for the latter’s trespass. By his cross-complaint Gaskell sought to quiet title to the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. West Coast Shows, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Armitage v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Salinero v. PonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Kinney v. OvertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API