Legal Opinion

Tonini v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1956No. S. F. 19421PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that petitioners be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years.

Two show cause orders directed to petitioners were consolidated for hearing. They charged petitioners with having solicited legal business from some 10 persons, most of whom had suffered injuries in accidents, in violation of rule 2, section a, Rules of Professional Conduct (33 Cal.2d 27).1

The Board of Governors found the charges sustained and recommended that petitioners be suspended for one year on each count…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Howe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Mayer v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Waterman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sturr v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ashe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Honoroff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Mitton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API