Legal Opinion

In Re Hallinan

California Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1957No. S. F. 19053PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Vincent W. Hallinan was convicted of violating section 145, subdivision (b), of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 145, subd. (b)), by “wilfully and knowingly filing false and fraudulent income tax returns.” He did not appeal, and the time for appeal having elapsed, The State Bar filed with this court a certified copy of the indictment and judgment of conviction and asked that he be disciplined.

After a hearing before this court the matter was referred to the Board of Governors of The State Bar for hearing and recommendation on the question whether the facts and circumstances…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Rheb v. Bar Ass'n of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Alkow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In Re Disbarment of Julius E. DiesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Matter of HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Tseung Chu v. CornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. In Re MannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API