Legal Opinion

Waterman v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1939No. L. A. 17133PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, J., pro tem.

This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the board of governors of The State Bar that petitioner be disbarred.

It is charged that petitioner is guilty of a violation of rule 3 of Rules of Professional Conduct of The State Bar (213 Cal. cxiii) in that he engaged another to solicit professional employment for him, commonly referred to as “ambulance chasing”, and, further, that the petitioner wilfully, intentionally and with a view of furthering his own personal interest gave testimony under oath before a committee of The State Bar, which testimony was untrue, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re VaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Waterman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In re WellcomeMontana Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Davey v. DaveyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Swartz v. California Olive Growers' Packing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Kitsis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API