Legal Opinion

Sturr v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1959No. L. A. 25274PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years. The Board of Governors found that petitioner (1) violated his oath and duties as an attorney and counselor at law, (2) committed acts involving moral turpitude and dishonesty within the meaning of section 6106 of the Business and Professions Code, 1 and (3) violated rules 9 and 12 of the Buies of Professional Conduct of The State Bar. 2

Questions : First. Did petitioner violate (1) his oath and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Aydelotte v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Ring v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Mills v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Narlian v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API