Legal Opinion
Clark v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1952No. L. A. 22166PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner Oliver O. Clark is charged in six counts with violation of his oath and duties as an attorney (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6067, 6103), with violation of rule 9 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California (commingling of funds), and with commission of acts involving moral turpitude and dishonesty. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6106.) After a hearing, the local administrative committee found, except as to Counts One and Five, that the acts alleged to have been committed or omitted were in fact committed or omitted. The committee found, however, that there was no…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Guardianship of ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Jacobs v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- In re LiceagaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Campbell v. MaganaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. KraschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Washington Legal Foundation v. Legal Foundation Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.