Legal Opinion

Ashe v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1969No. S. F. 22624PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of a disciplinary board of the State Bar that petitioners be suspended from the practice of law for six months for professional misconduct in violation of their oaths and duties as attorneys and counselors (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6067, 6068, 6103) and wilfully violating rule 2, section a(l) and (2), and rule 3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

The accusation against petitioners is that they indirectly solicited professional employment through their salaried investigator, Harold McGlenon, and ratified acts of solicitation by him.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hildebrand v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Most v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Honoroff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Steiner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Crooks v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Rose v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API