Legal Opinion

Mitton v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1958No. S. F. 19746PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Bar Governors of The State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months.

The local administrative committee found in one count a violation of rule 7 (representing conflicting interest) and rule 10 (improperly advising on a case without being consulted in reference thereto) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. In other counts the local committee also found three solicitations in violation of rule 2 and recommended that petitioner be disbarred. The Board of Bar Governors dismissed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Friday v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Libarian v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Higgins v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Tonini v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Sawyer v. State Bar of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Linnick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ashe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Honoroff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Armstrong v. HookerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API