Mayer v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This is a proceeding instituted for the purpose of reviewing the action of the board of governors of The State Bar of California in recommending the. disbarment of petitioner as an attorney at law of this state. The local administrative committee before whom the charges against petitioner were originally heard made its findings that the petitioner had violated section 29 of the State Bar Act by wilfully breaching rule 2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct; that petitioner had committed acts involving moral turpitude, as defined by section 287, subdivision 5, of the Code of Civil Procedure in…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Best v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Libarian v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re Members of the State Bar of Arizona, BatesArizona Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.