Legal Opinion

Byard v. Hoelscher

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 31, 1930PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

This controversy concerns a tract of land of about three acres, which both the plaintiff and the defendants claim, and the right to the use of a certain driftway in connection with it. The trial court held that the land was the property of the plaintiff but that there had been an abandonment of the driftway. The plaintiff and one defendant have appealed, the defendant claiming error in the decision in respect to the ownership of the land, and the plaintiff claiming error with reference to the finding of an abandonment of the driftway.

The trial court in its finding has traced the title of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Phillips v. BonadiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Richardson v. TumbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Lengyel v. PeregrinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Temple v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Berger v. Town of GuilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  4. Struzinski v. StruzinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Bond v. BenningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API