Legal Opinion
Smith v. Muellner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 14, 2007No. SC 17700PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
This appeal raises issues concerning the acquisition and extinguishment of easement rights. The defendants, Colleen A. Muellner and Robert Muellner, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court quieting title to certain real property owned by the plaintiff, Peter W. Smith. 2 The defendants claim that the court: (1) improperly concluded that a deeded right-of-way they possessed over the plaintiffs property had been extinguished through the plaintiffs adverse use of the right-of-way; (2) improperly concluded that their predecessors in title had abandoned the right-of-way;…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Castle Associates v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Orcutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Gould v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hansen v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.