Legal Opinion

Lengyel v. Peregrin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 4, 1926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The claims of the appellant which are pursued on her brief and in argument are, in substance, that the grantor, Peter Peregrin, was so ousted of possession that his deed to the plaintiffs is void, and that, by reason of the state of the land records relating to the attachment of the real estate, the plaintiffs had constructive notice of and took title subject to the claim of the defendant as made in the complaint in her action against her husband.

In order to render a deed void under § 5098 of the General Statutes, the grantor must have been ousted by an entry and possession under a claim of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Holmes, Booth & Atwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  2. Canfield v. GregorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. Merwin v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  5. C. & C. Electric Motor Co. v. D. Frisbie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Clark v. DrskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  2. Basak v. DamutzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Wildwood Associates, Ltd. v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Myers v. BurkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Andretta v. Fox New England Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API