Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 5, 1926PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The plaintiff’s action is to quiet title to a right of way which he claims to be three rods wide and to be appurtenant to a tract of land owned by him. This the defendant denies, and further pleads that if the plaintiff’s predecessors ever had such a right of way it has been lost by abandonment or by adverse possession. The principal facts as found by the trial court may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff owns, in fee simple, a piece of land in Greenwich, containing two and one-half acres, more or less, having obtained title by deed from John E. Knapp, dated June 1st, 1921, and by a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Town of Derby v. AllingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
- Hennessy v. . MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Parsons v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Porter v. . International Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Goldman v. QuadratoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Birdsey v. KosienskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.