Legal Opinion
Struzinski v. Struzinsky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 26, 1947PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
This is an action brought by a co-tenant seeking partition or, as an alternative, sale of real estate. The named defendant has appealed from a judgment for the plaintiff decreeing that the real estate be sold. The statutory proceeding for sale in such a case as this (General Statutes § 5927) is ancillary to that for partition (General Statutes § 5922); Kaiser v. Second National Bank, 123 Conn. 248, 256, 193 A. 761; Harrison v. International Silver Co., 78 Conn. 417, 420, 62 A. 342; and the issue is whether the action for partition will lie, the claim of the defendant being that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dawson v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Chamberlain v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
- Paton v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Hartford Realization Co. v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Stonybrook, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Penfield v. JarvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Fernandes v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Leonard v. BailwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.