Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Marandas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2012No. OSB 07-03; SC S058559PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar charged John S. Marandas (the accused) with numerous violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility. A trial panel found that the accused had violated RPC 8.4(a)(3) and former DR 1-102(A)(3) by acting dishonestly and by making misrepresentations to the court and other parties and RPC 8.4(a)(4) by engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. The trial panel suspended the accused for three months. We review the decision of the trial panel de novo. ORS 9.536(2); BR 10.6. Because we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GygiOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CariniOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In re McGrawOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  4. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API