Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Carini

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2013No. OSB 10125; SC S060708PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline proceeding, the Bar charged the accused with violating Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 8.4(a)(4), which prohibits engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. The trial panel determined that the accused had violated that rule, and it recommended his suspension from the practice of law for 30 days. On review, the accused challenges the trial panel’s determinations regarding the rule violation and sanction. On de novo review, we find that the accused violated RPC 8.4(a)(4), and we further conclude that a 30-day suspension is the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RookOregon Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re ArdOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of GattiOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In re AshtonOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  5. In re AshtonOregon Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API