Legal Opinion

In re McGraw

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2018No. SC S064091PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

*843**668In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged Scott W. McGraw (the accused) with multiple violations of the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) arising out of his actions as a conservator for Dr. Carol A. Saslow, now deceased. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board conducted a hearing, found that the accused had violated those rules, and determined that the appropriate sanction was suspension from the practice of law for a period of 18 months. The accused seeks review of the trial panel's finding that he committed the alleged violations. For the reasons…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re MaurerOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re ArdOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  4. In re GraeffOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In re AshtonOregon Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API