Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDuncan, J.
As the majority describes, to prove their Unlawful Trade Practices Act claim, plaintiffs have to prove three elements: an unlawful trade practice, causation, and damages. 257 Or App at 117. The majority holds that each of those elements can be litigated on a class-wide basis. I respectfully disagree. In my view, the element of causation cannot be litigated on a class-wide basis.
As the majority holds, to prove the causation element of their particular claim — viz., that they and the putative class members suffered ascertainable losses “as a result of’ the alleged unlawful trade practice, ORS…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robert L. Moore and Jeannette S. Parry v. Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Bernard v. First National Bank of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.