Legal Opinion
CACHIL DEHE BAND OF WINTUN INDIANS v. California
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 22, 2009No. CIV. S-04-2265 FCD KJMPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants State of California, California Gambling Control Commission (the “Commission” or “CGCC”), and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s (collectively, the “defendants”) motion for judgment on the pleadings against plaintiff Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community (“Colusa”), defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment against Colusa, Colusa’s motion for summary judgment, defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff-intervenor Picayune Ranchería of the Chukchansi Indians’ (“Picayune”) complaint,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.