Legal Opinion

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 1986No. 85-198PublishedCited by 117,708 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the motion of petitioner Celotex Corporation for summary judgment against respondent Catrett because the latter was unable to produce evidence in support of her allegation in her wrongful-death complaint that the decedent had been exposed to petitioner’s asbestos products. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed, however, holding that petitioner’s failure to support its motion with evidence tending to negate such exposure precluded the entry of summary judgment in its favor.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Myrtle Nell Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Louis H. Catrett, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

3Cited by117,708 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

117,703 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API