Legal Opinion
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 2015No. 14-56104, 14-56105PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
. Opinion by Judge TALLMAN; Dissent by Chief District Judge JARVEY.
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Sixteen years ago more than sixty Native American tribes entered into Tribal-State Gaming Compacts with the State of California. Sadly, the long and tortured history leading to the culmination of these Compacts did not cease there. Rather, litigation based on ambiguous provisions as to the number of authorized gaming devices has ensued for most of the duration of these Compacts. See In re Indian Gaming Related Cases, 331 F.3d 1094, 1095-1107 (9th Cir.2003) (detailing the entire history before and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Native Village of Noatak v. Edgar Blatchford, as Commissioner, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Curtin, James A. v. United Airln IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Morales-Izquierdo v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Skinner v. Northrop Grumman Retirement Plan BCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rabelo-Rodriguez v. United States Secretary of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021