Legal Opinion
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 2015No. Nos. 14-56104, 14-56105PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TALLMAN; Dissent by Chief District Judge JARVEY.
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The panel has voted to amend its previous opinion and issues the following opinion to replace it. With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing and to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petitions for panel rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Ronald Barranco v. 3D Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Chicken Ranch Rancheria v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Casino Pauma v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Ross Dress for Less, Inc. v. Makarios-Oregon, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.