Legal Opinion

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 22, 1967No. 39PublishedCited by 6,019 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

In 1962 Congress amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (52 Stat. 1040, as amended by the Drug Amendments of 1962, 76 Stat. 780, 21 U. S. C. § 301 et seq.), to require manufacturers of prescription drugs to print the “established name” of the drug “prominently and in type at least half as large as that used thereon for any proprietary name or designation for such drug,” on labels and other printed material, § 502 (e)(1)(B), 21 U. S. C. § 352 (e)(1)(B). The “established name” is one designated by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare pursuant to § 502(e)(2) of the Act, 21…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6,019 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

6,014 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API