Legal Opinion
Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. California
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 11, 2009No. CIV. S-04-2265 FCD KJMPublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants State of California, California Gambling Control Commission (the “Commission” or “CGCC”), and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s (collectively, the “defendants”) motion for reconsideration, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 1 of the court’s April 22, 2009 Memorandum and Order, 629 F.Supp.2d 1091 (E.D.Cal.2009) (the “April 22 Order”), granting in part and denying in part the parties’ motions for summary judgment and motion for judgment on the pleadings as to six of the seven claims…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- United States v. Tommy Martin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Rockland Exposition, Inc. v. Alliance of Automotive Service ProvidersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Teamsters Local 617 Pension & Welfare Funds v. Apollo Group, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- American States Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- (PC) Barbour v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Johnson v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.