Mock v. Shulman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Plaintiffs brought this action for damages and to restrain defendants from maintaining a thick growth of a line of 16 Forbes Cypress trees which were blocking their view. From a judgment awarding damages and granting an injunction, defendants appeal.
Plaintiffs Harold and Ruth Mock and defendants Harold and Beverly King Shulman are adjacent property owners of hillside lots. Mocks’ property is immediately to the north and above the Shulman property. Mock purchased his property in 1951, at which time the Shulman property was vacant, and Mock had a view which he described as a panorama of West…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Knoch v. HaizlipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southern California Edison Co. v. BourgerieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- SEA PINES PLANTATION COMPANY v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Sain v. SilvestreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ezer v. FuchslochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hemmerling v. Tomlev, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.