Legal Opinion

Ezer v. Fuchsloch

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1979No. Civ. 53420PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.

This is an appeal by defendants Heinz Fuchsloch and Christine Fuchsloch from a mandatory injunction issued against them following a trial on a complaint filed against them by plaintiffs Mitchel J. Ezer and Frances L. Ezer. The dispute results from the fact that plaintiffs and defendants are neighbors residing in a hillside area located in Pacific Palisades. The complaint alleged that the improved property of plaintiffs was directly opposite of the defendants’ improved property and property owned by the Staleys, also named as defendants in the action. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Art Movers, Inc. v. Ni West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Welsch v. GoswickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Ticor Title Insurance v. Rancho Santa Fe Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. SEA PINES PLANTATION COMPANY v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API