Legal Opinion

Knoch v. Haizlip

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1912No. L.A. No. 2858PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The complaint presents two counts, one for the breach of an agreement under which, as the plaintiffs claim, they became entitled to an easement for light over the lands of the defendants, and the second to recover damages from the defendants for alleged fraud in connection with the making of said agreement. The findings of the court were against the allegations of fraud and as these findings are fully sustained by the evidence, there is no occasion to further consider this cause of action.

Most of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Haight v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bank of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Gas Appliance Sales Co. v. W. B. Bastian Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Mock v. ShulmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Crease v. JarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API