Legal Opinion
People v. Amdur
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 1954No. Crim. A. 28PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWagler, P. J.
Defendant and appellant, Reuel S. Amdur, was convicted of a violation of section 12.1 of Ordinance No. 3262-N.S. of the city of Berkeley, in that said defendant on or about the 6th day of February, 1953, “unlawfully placed and caused to be placed on a sidewalk a table which obstructed, restricted, and prevented the use of a portion of said sidewalk.”
On this appeal appellant asserts (1) that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment; (2) that the ordinance is unconstitutional as written; (3) that the ordinance is unconstitutional as applied; and (4) that the rejection of certain…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Lafayette v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Floresta, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.