Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Cameron

California Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1952No. L. A. 21537PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*266TRAYNOR, J.

Plaintiff owns and occupies a house on the east side of San Ysidro Drive, Los Angeles, at the bottom of Pea Vine Canyon. Defendant owns approximately 30 acres of land on the west slope of the canyon. In the summer and fall of 1946 defendant undertook leveling operations on his property. These operations consisted of removing the tops of three knolls and casting the earth over the sides of adjoining canyons, forming fills. Approximately one fifth of the earth was pushed over the west side of the Pea Vine Canyon northwest of plaintiff’s house. In November of 1946 as a result of heavy…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Phillips v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API