Southern California Edison Co. v. Bourgerie
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
The sole question at issue is whether a building restriction in a deed constitutes “property” for purposes of article I, section 14, of the California Constitution1 so that compensation must be made to a landowner who has been damaged by the construction of an improvement which violates the restriction on land acquired by eminent domain.
*171In 1964, defendants purchased a tract of land in Santa Barbara from the Bank of America; the bank retained a portion of the tract adjoining defendants’ property on the west. The deed from the bank to defendants provided that the property…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Town of Stamford v. VuonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Friesen v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lombardy v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Aaron v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Committee to Save Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'n v. Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.