Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. Bourgerie

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1973No. L.A. 30095PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The sole question at issue is whether a building restriction in a deed constitutes “property” for purposes of article I, section 14, of the California Constitution1 so that compensation must be made to a landowner who has been damaged by the construction of an improvement which violates the restriction on land acquired by eminent domain.

*171In 1964, defendants purchased a tract of land in Santa Barbara from the Bank of America; the bank retained a portion of the tract adjoining defendants’ property on the west. The deed from the bank to defendants provided that the property…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Town of Stamford v. VuonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Friesen v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lombardy v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Aaron v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Committee to Save Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'n v. Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API