Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
— Defendant Kingsburg Cotton Oil Company appeals from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict given after it had been granted a limited new trial on the sole issue of damages. No appeal was taken from the order granting the limited new trial.
Defendant owns, and operates a cotton gin on land adjacent to plaintiffs’ property which is used for residential purposes and the operation of a planing mill. The area in question was zoned for business and commercial purposes. Defendant is engaged in the business of ginning lint cotton and processing cottonseed, which lasts approximately six months…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Great Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.