Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Grosso

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1953No. L. A. 22313PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

This action presents a controversy between owners of a private road and easement and the owners of the servient tenement. The following diagram, not drawn to scale, shows the relationship of the road and easement to the parcels of land involved.

Mrs. Mildred Schneider originally owned the land bounded by Blair Drive, Hollywood Freeway, the Rosin property, and the Universal Pictures property. The land is hilly with the crest of the hill at the center. Plaintiffs Leonard and Alma Herzog purchased parcel 1 in 1944 and built a home thereon. At that time the only access to a public road from parcel…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API