Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Citizens for a Better Portsmouth v. Sydnor
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1990No. 90-1749PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Per curiam
We granted the writ to require placement of the proposed charter amendment on the November 6 ballot because we construe Section 166 of the Portsmouth City Charter to require submission of such an issue to the electorate. Section 166 provides in part:
“Amendments to this charter may be submitted to the electors of the City by an affirmative vote of at least all the members elected to Council less two of the Council, and shall be submitted by the Council when a petition signed by ten percentum (10%) of the electors of the City voting at the last general election setting forth any such proposed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Billington v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Polcyn v. BurkhartOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Jurcisin v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Prairie Twp. Trustees v. GarverOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Houghton v. PethtelOhio Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by41 opinions
- City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Morris v. City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Spencer v. East Liverpool Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.