Legal Opinion

Billington v. Cotner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1974No. 73-180PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

Under R. C. 733.59 and 733.61, if a taxpayer brings suit to enjoin the misapplication of municipal funds, after the city solicitor has refused to bring the action upon being requested to do so, attorney fees may be allowed to the taxpayer and taxed as costs, provided judgment is finally ordered in his favor. The allowance of fees is permissive and is a matter which lies entirely within the sound discretion of the trial judge. See State, ex rel. Scott, v. Masterson (1962), 173 Ohio St. 402, 406, 183 N. E. 2d 376; Howard v. Cleveland (1964), 95 Ohio Law Abs. 304, 200 N. E. 2d 349.

*19Considerations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. White v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Brauer v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Howard v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Morris v. City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Citizens for a Better Portsmouth v. SydnorOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API