State ex rel. Polcyn v. Burkhart
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellants’ main contention is that the Toledo City Council is not required to submit to the electorate a proposed amendment to the Charter of the city of Toledo if, in Council’s opinion, the substantive content of the proposed amendment is “invalid on its face,” even though there are a sufficient number of valid signatures on the petition proposing such an amendment.
Section 9, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution, provides, in part:
“Amendments to any charter framed and adopted as herein provided may be submitted to the electors of a municipality by a two-thirds vote of the legislative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Markus v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State, Ex Rel. v. BigelowOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Hinchliffe v. GibbonsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Waltz v. MichellOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Poor v. AddisonOhio Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Morris v. City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Citizens for a Better Portsmouth v. SydnorOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.