Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cater v. City of North Olmsted

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1994No. 92-1073PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

For a writ of mandamus to issue, Cater must establish that North Olmsted has a clear legal duty to act as he demands, that he has a clear legal right to this relief, and that he has no other adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 29, 6 OBR 50, 51, 451 N.E.2d 225, 226.

Cater argues that (1) a list of aptitude test scores had not been compiled and the civil service commission had no duty to create one under the public record laws, (2) even if the commission owed this duty, Stroh’s failure to release the test scores was a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Ryan v. State Teachers Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API