Morris v. City Council
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, relator must establish that (1) he has a clear legal' right to have the charter amendment initiative placed on the November 8, 1994 ballot, (2) respondents have a corresponding legal duty to submit the charter amendment initiative to the electors of Macedonia on the November 8, 1994 ballot, and (3) relator possesses no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Seikbert v. Wilkinson (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 489, 490, 633 N.E.2d 1128, 1129.
Relator asserts in his sole proposition of law that respondents Macedonia City Council and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Citizens for a Better Portsmouth v. SydnorOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Semik v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Hinchliffe v. GibbonsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- State ex rel. City of Bedford v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. DeBrosse v. CoolOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Becker v. City of EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. City of Toledo v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.