Legal Opinion

City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. Sauline

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1996No. 94-1962PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Law of the Case

In Nolan v. Nolan (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 1, 3-4,11 OBR 1, 2-3, 462 N.E.2d 410, 412-413, we summarized the doctrine of the law of the case:

“ * * * [T]he decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels. * * *
“The doctrine is considered to be a rule of practice rather than a binding rule of substantive law and will not be applied so as to achieve unjust results. Gohman [v. St. Bernard (1924)], supra,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hawley v. RitleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Potain v. MathewsOhio Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hopkins v. DyerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Cordray v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 2009

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API